#HP MEDIASMART SERVER EX470 MEMORY UPGRADE WINDOWS#

#HP MEDIASMART SERVER EX470 MEMORY UPGRADE WINDOWS#

Second, there arenвЂ™t that many dramatic improvements to Windows Home Server performance that come from memory, but HD Video Record and File Copy to NAS are the strongest players here. First, the incremental value for spending $20 to $30 for a 2 GB module is just about what youвЂ™d expect it to be with many performance improvements in the 10-20% range at a cost of about 6.5% of the $380 base price for an EX470 refurb unit.

Looking over these results, three things are quite clear. Table 2 presents these results for the EX475 with the stock Sempron 3400+ processor for 512 MB, 2.0 GB, and 4.0 GB RAM (all values are MB/second all measurements come from a Gigabit Ethernet environment). This runs three sets of benchmarks back-to-back and presents average results for all three runs in the form of megabytes per second for throughput between client and server. NASPT permits batch runs of its testing programs to be launched. That also means these results are best interpreted as вЂњbest case performanceвЂќ (thatвЂ™s okay because I want to compare different configurations to one another, but these results may not reflect what youвЂ™ll see on your own networks).

To unmuddy the waters somewhat, I also killed all non-essential services on the Vista client from which the tests were run, and made sure to run those tests only when no scheduled tasks were active on the MediaSmart Server as well. In these benchmarks, however, instead of comparing multiple NAS systems to one another, IвЂ™ll compare the performance of the same system to itself, varying only the amount of memory available to handle the benchmarking tasks.

Hp mediasmart server ex470 memory upgrade